Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Indicators on banking law cases You Should Know
Blog Article
seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
A survey of PACER consumers, conducted in 2021, measured user satisfaction and identified areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of your U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize foreseeable future changes to PACER services and features.
To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not respond to inquiries seeking legal information or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to the court in which the case has long been or will be filed.
94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In case the appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then technique the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the 90 days for your department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided by the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Dr.
The presiding judge emphasized the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological factors allows for any more comprehensive legal reaction.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision as well as the statutes.[four]
six. Mere involvement in the heinous offence is not any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for your concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, considering the fact that then he is guiding the bars, he is previous non-convict, never involved in almost any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his steady incarceration would not serve any advantageous purpose at this stage.
Section 302 on the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be issue on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
VI) The petitioner is driving the bars considering that arrest, investigation in the case is complete, he is no more essential for your purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him guiding the bars before conclusion of trial will provide no beneficial purpose.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its opportunity to safe financial interests and maintain the integrity from the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of such changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.
104 . Const. P. 1832/2019 (D.B.) Muhammad Fakhar ul Hasnain V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well recognized now that the provision for proforma promotion is not alien or unfamiliar into the civil servant service construction but it is already embedded in Fundamental Rule 17, wherein it is lucidly enumerated that the appointing authority may if contented that a civil servant who was entitled to get promoted from a particular date was, for no fault of his personal, wrongfully prevented from rendering service into the Federation/ province inside the higher post, direct that this sort of civil servant shall be paid the arrears of spend and allowances of such higher post through proforma promotion or upgradation arising from the antedated fixation of his/her seniority. Read more
This section specifically applies to civil servants that are rendered surplus due to reorganization or abolition of the division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, are not subject for the provisions on the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not use to non-civil servants. Read click here more